Naleena said:
I wanted Hillary so I am going to be like a little child throwing a temper tantrum in wallmart this year.
Yeaaah, I wanted Hillary too. . . and Bill back also. . . .
The important thing now to remember is that two to three Supreme Court Justice seats are going to be up for reappointment by the then sitting president in the next eight years.
So, it's no longer a question of whether you even like Obama or McCain. The
real question is whether you want McCain in there to appoint judges who are going to overturn Roe vs. Wade (the case that gives women the right to have legal abortions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade), or you want Obama in there to appoint judges who will make same-sex marriage (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage) a right.
Personally, I feel that the decision on whether or not to have an abortion rests with the woman in question, her significant other, her family, her doctor, her preacher/priest, etc., NOT some government man getting up in her face telling her what HE decides.
As far as the Gay Marriage issue, it is not my place to condemn ANYONE for loving someone else. And as for my fellow heterosexuals who claim that the "sanctity of marriage will be destroyed if gays are allowed to marry each other," they can just shut there hypocritical mouths and realize that straight people do not have ANY right to have ANY say over who can marry, and who can't, when over two-thirds of American marriages end in divorce. Besides, the gay community has
a lot of money (I used to tend bar at a drag-club, I know what kind of money goes through their hands). Just think how "lavishly decorative" there weddings are going to be, most of them costing much more than the average heterosexual marriage, giving much needed boosts to both local and national economies. AND, friends and countrymen, juuuuust think how expensive their divorces are going to be. . . .