csmswhs said:
I'm fairly certain that your objective with this comment was to get a rise out of me.
But to be honest, I just don't care enough to write a personal diatribe against you, so here is a complaint letter from an online automatic complaint generator. Enjoy.
Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about Csmswhs, I have a number of things to say that you may find useful. The first thing I want to bring up is that Csmswhs not only lies but brags about his lying to his cohorts. To put it crudely, it has long been obvious to attentive observers that he exhibits a reckless disregard for the safety of others. But did you know that Csmswhs's newsgroup postings violate the rational, enlightened claims of their own enunciatory modality? Csmswhs doesn't want you to know that because either he has no real conception of the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context.
Csmswhs's ultimata reek of absenteeism. I use the word "reek" because Csmswhs is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own disreputable ends. Why does he do that? Whenever that question is asked, Csmswhs and his secret agents run and hide. I suspect that that's precisely what they're going to do now so as to avoid hearing me say that mankind needs to do more to do what needs to be done. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that Csmswhs wants to pander to our worst fears. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that he will probably never understand why he scares me so much. And Csmswhs does scare me: His excuses are scary, his litanies are scary, and most of all, he managed to convince a bunch of besotted caitiffs (especially the shambolic type) to help him manipulate the unseen mechanisms of society so as to gain a respectable foothold for his horny epithets. What was the quid pro quo there? To help answer that question I will offer a single anecdote. A few weeks ago, I overheard some impractical tin-pot tyrant tell everyone who passed by that Csmswhs is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. Astounded, I asked this person if he realized that a careful appraisal of Csmswhs's editorials raises some thought-provoking issues. Not only was his answer "no", but it was also news to him that Csmswhs has announced his intentions to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. While doing so may earn Csmswhs a gold star from the mush-for-brains narcissism crowd, his propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't" and, "There is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of pharisaical stereotypes". What they don't tell you, though, is that no man who values himself, who has any regard for sound morality, or who feels any desire to see intellectual progress made certain, can rightfully join Csmswhs's loquacious attempt to deny the obvious.
Our battle with Csmswhs is a battle between spiritualism and antinomianism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that if we were to let Csmswhs get away with breaking down age-old institutions and customs, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. To him, Jacobinism is a kind of religion. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. When you get right down to it, by overusing such obscure words as "compartmentalization" and "epididymodeferentectomy" Csmswhs consistently manages to alienate his audience. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that Csmswhs's premise (that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization") is his morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Csmswhs uses this disguised morality to support his exegeses, thereby making his argument self-refuting. I could go on and on about his special form of alarmism, but you get the general idea. I'd like to end this letter with a message for Csmswhs. I'd like to say with emphasis and distinctness—not as a threat, but as a warning—that I will do whatever it takes to end his control over the minds and souls of countless people, and I won't let him stop me from achieving that goal.
