The British National Party - Racists or Patriots?

Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum

Help Support Loneliness, Depression & Relationship Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Solitary man

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
190
Reaction score
12
Location
UK
The BNP on immigration:

"Given current demographic trends, we, the indigenous British people, will become an ethnic minority in our own country well within sixty years – and most likely sooner.

All the signs are there:

- At least 84 percent – and likely more – of all current UK citizenship applications are from the Third World;

- Fourteen percent of all primary school children do not have English as a mother tongue;

- At least 316 primary schools in England have a large majority of children whose first language is not English;

- Non-indigenous births will soon account for more than half of all the babies born in Britain;

- Over the next twenty five years, immigration will account for forty percent of all new households set up in this country;

- Some 3.7 million legal migrants have entered this country since 1997 – and 2.5 million are from outside the European Union; and

- At least twenty percent of the currently resident population were either born overseas or are descendants of foreign-born parents.

The vast majority of these foreign-born residents are of Third World extraction. According to figures released by the Office for National Statistics, at least eleven percent of all people living in Britain today were born overseas. This figure does not include their second or third generation children.

All these facts point inexorably to the overwhelming and extinguishing of Britain and British identity under a tsunami of immigration. To ensure that this does not happen, and that the British people retain their homeland and identity, we call for an immediate halt to all further immigration, the immediate deportation of criminal and illegal immigrants, and the introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement whereby those immigrants who are legally here will be afforded the opportunity to return to their lands of ethnic origin assisted by a generous financial incentives both for individuals and for the countries in question.

We will abolish the ‘positive discrimination’ schemes that have made white Britons second-class citizens. We will also clamp down on the flood of ‘asylum seekers’, all of whom are either bogus or can find refuge much nearer their home countries.

The BNP’s policy is to:

- Deport all the two million plus who are here illegally;

- Deport all those who commit crimes and whose original nationality was not British;

- Review all recent grants of residence or citizenship to ensure they are still appropriate;

- Offer generous grants to those of foreign descent resident here who wish to leave permanently;

- Stop all new immigration except for exceptional cases;

- Reject all asylum seekers who passed safe countries on their way to Britain.

Immigration is out of control. Britain’s population is now over 60 million and rising, solely due to immigration. Not only is Britain increasingly overcrowded, but the fact is that a country is the product of its people and if you change the people you inevitably change the nature of the country.

We want Britain to remain – or return to – the way it has traditionally been. We accept that Britain always will have ethnic minorities and have no problem with this as long as they remain minorities and do not change nor seek to change the fundamental culture and identity of the indigenous peoples of the British Isles.

The current open-door policy and unrestricted, uncontrolled immigration is leading to higher crime rates, demand for more housing (driving prices out of the reach of young people), severe extra strain on the environment, traffic congestion, longer hospital waiting lists, lower educational standards, higher income taxes, lower wages, higher unemployment, loss of British identity, a breakdown in community spirit, more restrictive policing, higher council taxes, a shortage of council homes, higher levels of stress and unhappiness and a more atomised society.

India would not tolerate millions of non-Indians taking over that society. Pakistan would not tolerate millions of Hindus or Christians entering that country and changing it from a Muslim society into something else. Japan would not do it; China would not do it – so why should Britain?

Can anyone imagine Saudi Arabia allowing the mass immigration of Christians, so that in a few decades it would no longer be an Islamic country?

Each nation has the right to maintain its own identity. The right of India to remain Indian, the right of China to remain Chinese, the right of Pakistan to remain Pakistani and the right of Saudi Arabia to remain Saudi does not mean that any of these nations “hate” anybody else.

All it means is that they wish to preserve their identity and national existence.

This is all the British National Party seeks for Britain – the right to be British.

This is not an extreme demand – it is actually just perfectly normal and completely in line with the rights granted to every other nation and with international law.

All the other parties shy away from this issue, because they are the ones who have caused the problem in the first place.

Only the British National Party has the reasonable, sensible, fair and just immigration policy which will guarantee that Britain remains British."


The BNP have an unenviable reputation as being racist, and that is because they oppose immigration and many immigrants in Britain are non-white. But not all immigrants are non-white, take the Polish for example, and they oppose their presence too.

So is it feasible to continue using the "racist" label to tag the BNP, when it is clear that they oppose all immigration and regardless of race?

Are the BNP racists or patriots with Britain's best interests at heart?

Perhaps both?


 
The party as a whole or not racist or patriots.

I've met and work with a number BNP supporters/members and most of them are just sick and tired of the larger parties. Unfortunately, it seems the people at the top of the party are the loonies and fruitcakes.

Nick Griffin is a lying coward who has fleeced them out of money and whilst they have him in charge they will get nowhere.

It's interesting how most will slam this party down as nothing but racist nazis. If you heard the stories i've been told then you would know the real nazis are your local friendly MPs.

The BNP plays a useful role in British politics but any party with the word national in it will never make any real progress.
 
I've seen undercover footage of private BNP rallies and they really aren't pleasant. The leader of the party is a bigoted scumbag too.

Looking at their policies (as laid out here), I'd actually say some of them are reasonable.

For example, I think it's completely ridiculous that we can't deport extremist Muslim clerics who preach hate...and instead give them houses on the tax payer o_0

Similarly, Labour made a farce of immigration for years and as a result we have thousands of rapists and murderers living undetected in our country.

However, the BNP attracts a lot of skinheads and similar dubious fascism-related characters: my reasoning is that this is because the policies they show in public are a mask for a more sinister face in private. Their definition of "British", for example, tends to be very shaky when they are pressed on it.

I think the only reason they have gathered support is because the "Big Parties" aren't addressing issues that people are getting thoroughly fed up with.

So I'd say they're a pretty scummy party, they simply maintain an air of respectability to try and make their more extreme views seem reasonable.
 
The BNP does have "skinheads" and others but to say a lot is false.

All this undercover footage you have seen is the only part of the party the left-wing media are prepared to allow you to see. Once everyone's seen that then the usual steretyped assumption of them is made.

But as i stated earlier this party is mainly made of good people who only want the best for them and their fellow neighbour.

I don't support the BNP but i like to keep any open mind and not just cast them off as racist thugs.
 
Clearly the BNP have its extreme element, and it would be wrong to dismiss it. It would be equally wrong to tar them all with the same brush ie. as neo-Nazi skinheads. I haven't seen a skinhead since the 1980's, so wherever these skinheads are, they're doing a very adequate job of making themselves inconspicuous.

Undercover footage may have unearthed the extreme element of the BNP, but undercover documentary film makers have also uncovered the hate teaching that goes on in many of Britain's mosques, where Muslim children are taught to view the indigenous (non-Islamic) British people as their social and religious inferiors ie. kuffar and infidel, and all because they are not Muslim.

There are many elements of extremism in British society, and like tends to breed like. But most people, even those who have experienced unfair and perhaps discriminatory treatment at the hands of one particular group or another, do not allow themselves to enter the fray with retaliatory extremism.

 
I think EDL are worse than BNP in the racist thug area. At least the BNP tries to be a political party, EDL are the true nasty racist thugs. Although both groups are a vile blot on Britain.

That being said we are a country run by a party that once had the slogan "If you want a nigger for a neighbour, vote Liberal or Labour"
 

Latest posts

Back
Top