This thread is getting long :~0
Well, I've always loved science...
Modern Science Disproves the Evolutionary Theory:
Christian Science-
http://www.biblelife.org/creation.htm
Muslim Science-
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/
This is Why Evolution scares me:
"Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows."
-From Charles Darwin
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life
!!!Don't you find that scary!!!... people believing in the Theory of Evolution must also accept that, for this world to improve and become better, we must have war, famine and death to produce better animals.
I think if Darwin was alive today he'd read about DNA design, then he'd slap himself on the head and say "Uh oh, I better go rewrite my theory!"
DNA is a blueprint for human construction... could it perhaps have been mentioned in the Bible as the "name in the book of life" that we all have a right to? After all, names get used again and again but DNA science shows us that everyone is uniquely identifiable and therefor had their name written long before they were born. Also due to the numbering sequence of DNA it is also possible now that the mark of the beast the anti-Christ will bear could actually be reference to a specific DNA sequence. But that business about DNA being the mark of the beast is all craziness I think.
This is why:
"The ‘wisdom’ to work out the number will be given to those (maybe us) living at the time of the rising of the beast. Suddenly what we have been reading will make sense. The mystery will be ended. The very fact that John writes "Here is wisdom, Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast..." shows that not everyone has such wisdom or understanding.
We believe in something that theologians call "progressive revelation." This means that certain Bible truths regarding last day events are revealed more fully as the events approach. For instance, few people spoke of the ‘rapture of the church’ before the 1800s. Even though it was always there in the Bible few understood it or thought about it. It was only at the beginning of this century that light was shed more intensely upon this subject. Now we understand what Luther, Tyndale, Wesley and others did not grasp. The same is true regarding the number six hundred and sixty six."
Author Gary J. Hall - Taken from -
http://www.lwbc.co.uk/666.htm
However perhaps DNA could serve as a catalyst.
This information frightened me when I stumbled across it:
Scientists have found what they believe to be samples of Jesus Christs DNA and want to try to clone it...
http://english.pravda.ru/society/anomal/75627-0/
DNA and EVOLUTION:
I read some different subjects concerning DNA and evolution. The fact of the matter is that everything they say about it is not based in facts. The scientists make guess work of how it "may" have been a possibility for DNA to have evolved, especially since they "think" the creatures of the world came from an RNA design if you read on the "RNA world hypothesis" but it's all a bunch of imagination based information. There is no actual scientific proof that shows evolution to be true. None.
An interesting point that disputes evolution through DNA is that mutation rarely produces any form of benefit. In fact it would usually lead to either mutilation of a humans physical characteristics, inability for gene reproduction, or at sever enough levels- death.
Nowhere in DNA science is there hard evidence that mutation on this level could possibly lead to a better human. Look at a smoker... they mutate their DNA through inhalation of benzopyrene. Do they seem higher evolved than the non-smoking human, or do they seem to be on the same evolutionary level but with a physical problem? Belief in human evolution is an absurd notion that has no scientific basis.
It may be interesting like reading a book about dragons, fairies, princesses, and wizards, but it is a fairy tale just the same.
Another interesting theory that counters evolution is the Earths time line.
Evolutionists believe the world has been around for billions of years.
They come to this assumption on the basis of carbon dating, and also with geophysical studying of the layers that are produced in the earth. Carbon dating can be false... if there is a fire around the area or objects they date, then the carbon is contaminated and will produce false readings. There is a theory that perhaps in the time of the Dark Ages the meaning of the periods name was actually literal. That perhaps the earth had covered over in the darkness of a massive volcanic eruption that would have filled the sky with soot that would have carried far and wide. There is no proof of that theory yet though. The second thing is the Biblical account of the Flood. The account of the Flood tells how water came not only from the sky but also up from the earth itself. This massive raising of the water level on a global scale, not to mention it's eventual receding would have shifted, or stirred up, the earths layers in such a way as to make it impossible to determine the age of the earth based on geophysical formation. So really, the scientists have no way to tell the exact age of the earth, but it's very likely that it is not nearly as old as they think.
Anyway I'm going on and on... Just noticed posts concerning Evolution, and I find it's my duty to try and tell people that Evolution is NOT scientific fact, it is JUST THEORY. I saw the topic of evolution covered in our text book in elementary school. I complained about it but was FORCED to learn it and do test questions/homework on it or lose marks. I love science, and I want to learn scientific facts, not some crackpot ideas some dead guy had many years ago that don't have basis in scientific fact. I remember how disturbing it was to see that in my textbook. It really made no sense that the teacher was trying to tell me fantasies about ancestors being apes. It'd be like a teacher showing the movie Planet of the Apes in elementary school and saying "Well kids, this is exactly what the future will be like."
Aristotle (Greek philosopher as well as teacher to Alexander the Great of Macedonia) believed that gases created in our stomaches when we eat would rise up to the head and make us feel warm and happy. I read the works of Aristotle when I was twelve so that's not a direct quote, but that was the rough idea that he had so long ago... how come we aren't learning about that in biology today? Or what about reading the innards of chickens? You never know it could be a valuable decision making tool at business meetings.
Anyway, I'll leave it at that before I start another rant