ヾ(^▽^)ノ -Chippy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
- Messages
- 63
- Reaction score
- 0
Would you live in my system?
All new enterprise is funded by the state.
Billy wants to start a shop.
He goes to a board of technocrats that approve his funding.
The profits from Billy's shop are divided between the workers with Bill receiving a higher percent of the profit as a royalty for his idea something low like %5 that could be increased if the workers decided he deserved more.
This would promote equity and encourage people to develop enterprise so they could take the royalty's.
The shop would be free to pick and name brand and price for it's products and who it hired.
Workers who did not have jobs would have to work for their welfare doing jobs building public infrastructure like roads.
F.A.Qs
A
bviously you had no contact with bureaucrats in your life whatsoever at all
Q:The technocrats would have a strict code of contact in favour of the public.
They would only disapprove funding if the idea was pure honeysuckle.
Also I would make local community boards that had funding given to them to plan things like free public transport.
The community (Or suburb in the cities) would vote on idea submitted by the public on what to spend the funds on e.g a park, a free bus.
All new houses would be build with solar panels and be self sufficient with a rooftop rain collection for water as well.
Q: Do you have a military?
A:Military would be dismissed and a squad of peace keeping diplomats would take their place.
Peace treaty would be established with every country possible.
We would take no part in any war and governing of other nations
Q:Billy's shop starts go to really well, generating an enormous revenue. It is divided between the workers and the owner.
Now, these workers do the exact same job as the workers at John's company, but that one isn't doing very well.
This goes on for a few years, and there are some major companies like we have now, hoarding in cash.
Now, a job at this company is very wanted, because you'll earn 100 times more than at John's company, for doing the exact same: Everyone wants to work at Billy's company. The (now wealthy) employed can through their financial power give these jobs to friends/family, creating one big corrupt nation.
A:Your state funding of all new enterprise idea is fucktarded.
This ensure equity and stability. Loan sharks cannot be trusted.
The funding for this new enterprise would come from a "investment tax" if the new enterprise made a profit it some of it would pay back the people who had to pay for it's start up though a "investment tax" they would be continue to be paid this tax till they had it back 2 hold.
If it made a loss DEALWITH.JPG nothing is perfect brah.
Q:But what about loss?
A: No such thing as "loans", "debit" or "credit" in my society.
Therefore it couldn't make a loss all stock would have to be paid for before it was given.
If the enterprise runs out of money then it's bust. Must be reviewed by the technocrats for more funding.
Q: Every guy you employ on roads comes at the cost of a job in the market
This wage will only cover basic living like welfare does.
A: At least they will be creating/working unlike welfare where they get hand outs.
Q: I'm sure workers will deal with it quite well when they find they lose half their pay because some gardenia up top made a wrong decision and the government is socializing the costs.
A: The tax wouldn't have to be that high. It would be dived between the whole population. It would be like 0.01 cents in every dollar.
Q:Therefore almost no growth. All money is debt, a promise of payment. People only trade those bits of paper around so they can get things with them.
A: Lol American style money... We would use a system like Bitcoin, or cash backed by gold/resource.
Q:Yes, but again. It will come at the expense of PRODUCTIVE jobs in the market.|
A:WhatsthisIdon'teven. People would want better jobs then being on a welfare where they had to work. It's better then the current welfare system.
All new enterprise is funded by the state.
Billy wants to start a shop.
He goes to a board of technocrats that approve his funding.
The profits from Billy's shop are divided between the workers with Bill receiving a higher percent of the profit as a royalty for his idea something low like %5 that could be increased if the workers decided he deserved more.
This would promote equity and encourage people to develop enterprise so they could take the royalty's.
The shop would be free to pick and name brand and price for it's products and who it hired.
Workers who did not have jobs would have to work for their welfare doing jobs building public infrastructure like roads.
F.A.Qs
A
bviously you had no contact with bureaucrats in your life whatsoever at allQ:The technocrats would have a strict code of contact in favour of the public.
They would only disapprove funding if the idea was pure honeysuckle.
Also I would make local community boards that had funding given to them to plan things like free public transport.
The community (Or suburb in the cities) would vote on idea submitted by the public on what to spend the funds on e.g a park, a free bus.
All new houses would be build with solar panels and be self sufficient with a rooftop rain collection for water as well.
Q: Do you have a military?
A:Military would be dismissed and a squad of peace keeping diplomats would take their place.
Peace treaty would be established with every country possible.
We would take no part in any war and governing of other nations
Q:Billy's shop starts go to really well, generating an enormous revenue. It is divided between the workers and the owner.
Now, these workers do the exact same job as the workers at John's company, but that one isn't doing very well.
This goes on for a few years, and there are some major companies like we have now, hoarding in cash.
Now, a job at this company is very wanted, because you'll earn 100 times more than at John's company, for doing the exact same: Everyone wants to work at Billy's company. The (now wealthy) employed can through their financial power give these jobs to friends/family, creating one big corrupt nation.
A:Your state funding of all new enterprise idea is fucktarded.
This ensure equity and stability. Loan sharks cannot be trusted.
The funding for this new enterprise would come from a "investment tax" if the new enterprise made a profit it some of it would pay back the people who had to pay for it's start up though a "investment tax" they would be continue to be paid this tax till they had it back 2 hold.
If it made a loss DEALWITH.JPG nothing is perfect brah.
Q:But what about loss?
A: No such thing as "loans", "debit" or "credit" in my society.
Therefore it couldn't make a loss all stock would have to be paid for before it was given.
If the enterprise runs out of money then it's bust. Must be reviewed by the technocrats for more funding.
Q: Every guy you employ on roads comes at the cost of a job in the market
This wage will only cover basic living like welfare does.
A: At least they will be creating/working unlike welfare where they get hand outs.
Q: I'm sure workers will deal with it quite well when they find they lose half their pay because some gardenia up top made a wrong decision and the government is socializing the costs.
A: The tax wouldn't have to be that high. It would be dived between the whole population. It would be like 0.01 cents in every dollar.
Q:Therefore almost no growth. All money is debt, a promise of payment. People only trade those bits of paper around so they can get things with them.
A: Lol American style money... We would use a system like Bitcoin, or cash backed by gold/resource.
Q:Yes, but again. It will come at the expense of PRODUCTIVE jobs in the market.|
A:WhatsthisIdon'teven. People would want better jobs then being on a welfare where they had to work. It's better then the current welfare system.
